제공사 리뷰평가 방법론 review-methodology-v1최종 검증 2026. 10. 25.신뢰도: medium

Cherry Servers — provider assessment

Subject: Cherry Servers

This assessment verifies ten Cherry Servers cloud VPS plans from the official pricing page's embedded plan data, including Gen 2 plans and storage VPS options across seven regions.

인터페이스는 번역되었지만 제공사 사실과 리뷰 본문은 현재 영어입니다. 품질 기준을 충족하는 번역 전까지 색인되지 않습니다.

총점 보류

The evidence coverage is insufficient for a single overall score. The dimension results below are evidence assessments, not a universal quality ranking.

결론

A credible mid-market option with explicit Gen 1/Gen 2 pricing and annual prepay discounts. The assessment withholds an overall score because IPv4/IPv6 inclusion and tax scope are not published, and no independent performance evidence exists.

평가 항목

Assessed dimensions have a score and rationale. Not-assessed dimensions remain visibly unknown; they are not assigned a neutral score.

평가 항목: Cherry Servers — provider assessment. 1–5.
항목상태점수근거와 증거
Location fitassessed4 / 5

Seven regions including Lithuania, Amsterdam, Chicago, Singapore and Tokyo are listed per plan.

Cherry ServersCherry Servers

Network performancenot assessed총점 보류

No independent throughput, latency or packet-loss test was run on this provider.

Policies and limitationsassessed2 / 5

IPv4/IPv6 inclusion and tax treatment are not published on the captured pages; backup availability is not stated per plan.

Cherry ServersCherry Servers

Price transparencyassessed4 / 5

Monthly and annual-prepay prices are published; the renewal price is the listed monthly rate. EUR pricing exists but USD is used for normalization.

Cherry ServersCherry Servers

Source freshnessassessed5 / 5

The selected official sources were observed on 2026-10-24 or 2026-10-25 and are listed below.

Cherry ServersCherry Servers

Specificationsassessed4 / 5

vCPU, RAM, NVMe/HDD size and traffic are published per plan, including the Gen 2 line with higher transfer.

Cherry ServersCherry Servers

Support and reliabilitynot assessed총점 보류

No support interaction or independent reliability data was collected.

강점

  • Gen 1 and Gen 2 lines with clearly different transfer allowances.
  • Annual prepay discount stated alongside the monthly rate.
  • Broad region list including Tokyo and Singapore.

약점과 한계

  • Address and tax fields are unpublished.
  • Backup availability is not stated per plan.

적합한 용도

  • Buyers who want multiple EU/US/APAC regions from one provider
  • Projects that can commit annually for a lower rate

부적합한 용도

  • Buyers who need confirmed IPv6 today
  • Backup-critical workloads without verification

알려진 미확인 사항

  • IPv4/IPv6 inclusion
  • Backup availability and price
  • Measured network performance

제한

  • No independent performance or support evidence was collected.
  • Bare-metal products were deliberately excluded from this assessment.

Correction path: use the source links and verification dates to challenge a claim. Do not treat an old snapshot as current.

대안

Gcore KVM-SSD-2

Comparable US-focused value with unlimited traffic.

Melbicom KVM-2-EU

Similar EU pricing with more selectable cities.

평가 방법론 · 리뷰

인용 증거